Paper detail

Handling highly correlated genes in prediction analysis of genomic studies

Background: Selecting feature genes to predict phenotypes is one of the typical tasks in analyzing genomics data. Though many general-purpose algorithms were developed for prediction, dealing with highly correlated genes in the prediction model is still not well addressed. High correlation among genes introduces technical problems, such as multi-collinearity issues, leading to unreliable prediction models. Furthermore, when a causal gene (whose variants have an actual biological effect on a phenotype) is highly correlated with other genes, most algorithms select the feature gene from the correlated group in a purely data-driven manner. Since the correlation structure among genes could change substantially when condition changes, the prediction model based on not correctly selected feature genes is unreliable. Therefore, we aim to keep the causal biological signal in the prediction process and build a more robust prediction model. Method: We propose a grouping algorithm, which treats highly correlated genes as a group and uses their common pattern to represent the group's biological signal in feature selection. Our novel grouping algorithm can be integrated into existing prediction algorithms to enhance their prediction performance. Our proposed grouping method has two advantages. First, using the gene group's common patterns makes the prediction more robust and reliable under condition change. Second, it reports whole correlated gene groups as discovered biomarkers for prediction tasks, allowing researchers to conduct follow-up studies to identify causal genes within the identified groups. Result: Using real benchmark scRNA-seq datasets with simulated cell phenotypes, we demonstrate our novel method significantly outperforms standard models in both (1) prediction of cell phenotypes and (2) feature gene selection.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.