Paper detail

Half of finite abelian groups are unit groups

A group is called realizable if it is the group of units in a ring with identity. The classification of realizable groups is a difficult open problem -- originally posed by László Fuchs -- and is an active area of research. Realizable groups seem rare, but their proportion within a fixed class of groups (cyclic, dihedral, finite abelian, etc.) varies. To quantify this proportion, we introduce the realizable density of a class of finite groups as an analog of natural density for subsets of the natural numbers. The realizable finite cyclic groups and the realizable finite abelian $p$-groups for $p$ odd have been classified; we prove that their realizable densities are 1/4 and 0, respectively. The realizable finite abelian 2-groups -- and more generally the realizable finite abelian groups -- have not been fully classified, and these special cases appear quite difficult. Nonetheless, we prove that the realizable density of finite abelian 2-groups is 1 and the realizable density of finite abelian groups is 1/2. Our work combines existing classification theorems for realizable groups with tools from analytic number theory.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.