Paper detail

Habits vs Environment: What really causes asthma?

Despite considerable number of studies on risk factors for asthma onset, very little is known about their relative importance. To have a full picture of these factors, both categories, personal and environmental data, have to be taken into account simultaneously, which is missing in previous studies. We propose a framework to rank the risk factors from heterogeneous data sources of the two categories. Established on top of EventShop and Personal EventShop, this framework extracts about 400 features, and analyzes them by employing a gradient boosting tree. The features come from sources including personal profile and life-event data, and environmental data on air pollution, weather and PM2.5 emission sources. The top ranked risk factors derived from our framework agree well with the general medical consensus. Thus, our framework is a reliable approach, and the discovered rankings of relative importance of risk factors can provide insights for the prevention of asthma.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.