Paper detail

H theorem for contact forces in granular materials

A maximum entropy theorem is developed and tested for granular contact forces. Although it is idealized, describing two dimensional packings of round, rigid, frictionless, cohesionless disks with coordination number Z=4, it appears to describe a central part of the physics present in the more general cases. The theorem does not make the strong claims of Edwards' hypothesis, nor does it rely upon Edwards' hypothesis at any point. Instead, it begins solely from the physical assumption that closed loops of grains are unable to impose strong force correlations around the loop. This statement is shown to be a generalization of Boltzmann's Assumption of Molecular Chaos (his \textit{stosszahlansatz}), allowing for the extra symmetries of granular stress propagation compared to the more limited symmetries of momentum propagation in a thermodynamic system. The theorem that follows from this is similar to Boltzmann's $H$ theorem and is presented as an alternative to Edwards' hypothesis for explaining some granular phenomena. It identifies a very interesting feature of granular packings: if the generalized \textit{stosszahlansatz} is correct, then the bulk of homogeneous granular packings must satisfy a maximum entropy condition simply by virtue of being stable, without any exploration of phase space required. This leads to an independent derivation of the contact force statistics, and these predictions have been compared to numerical simulation data in the isotropic case. The good agreement implies that the generalized \textit{stosszahlansatz} is indeed accurate at least for the isotropic state of the idealized case studied here, and that it is the reductionist explanation for contact force statistics in this case.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.