Paper detail

Guiding femtosecond high-intensity high-contrast laser pulses by copper capillaries

Propagation of high-intensity, high-contrast ($<10^{-8}$), 50\,fs laser pulses through triangilar copper capillaries is experimentally studied. The relative transmission through 20-mm-long, about 50\,$μ$m wide capillaries is directly measured to be 70\% for input intensities up to $10^{17}\,\text{W/cm}^2$. The copper reflectivity in vacuum, helium, and air is measured in the intensity range of $10^{10}$--$10^{17}\,\text{W/cm}^2$. No reflectivity decrease in vacuum and helium is observed, which leads to the conclusion that copper capillary waveguides can efficiently guide laser pulses of intensities up to $10^{19}\,\text{W/cm}^2$ on the capillary axis (that corresponds to $10^{17}\,\text{W/cm}^2$ on the walls). The reduction of the transmission efficiency to zero after a number of transmitted pulses is observed, which is caused by plug formation inside the capillary. The dependence of the capillary lifetime on the pulse energy is measured.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.