Paper detail

Guessing models and generalized Laver diamond

We analyze the notion of guessing model, a way to assign combinatorial properties to arbitrary regular cardinals. Guessing models can be used, in combination with inaccessibility, to characterize various large cardinals axioms, ranging from supercompactness to rank-to-rank embeddings. The majority of these large cardinals properties can be defined in terms of suitable elementary embeddings j\colon V_γ\to V_λ. One key observation is that such embeddings are uniquely determined by the image structures j [ V_γ]\prec V_λ. These structures will be the prototypes guessing models. We shall show, using guessing models M, how to prove for the ordinal κ_M=j_M (\crit(j_M)) (where π_M is the transitive collapse of M and j_M is its inverse) many of the combinatorial properties that we can prove for the cardinal j(\crit(j)) using the structure j[V_γ]\prec V_{j(γ)}. κ_M will always be a regular cardinal, but consistently can be a successor. Guessing models M with κ_M=\aleph_2 exist assuming the proper forcing axiom PFA. By means of these models we shall introduce a new structural property of models of PFA: the existence of a "Laver function" f : \aleph_2 \to H_{\aleph_2} sharing the same features of the usual Laver functions f :κ\to H_κprovided by a supercompact cardinal κ. Further applications of our analysis will be proofs of the singular cardinal hypothesis and of the failure of the square principle assuming the existence of guessing models. In particular the failure of square shows that the existence of guessing models is a very strong assumption in terms of large cardinal strength.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.