BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Matteo Viale

Matteo Viale contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Incompatible bounded category forcing axioms

We introduce bounded category forcing axioms for well-behaved classes $Γ$. These are strong forms of bounded forcing axioms which completely decide the theory of some initial segment of the universe $H_{λ_Γ^+}$ modulo forcing in $Γ$, for some cardinal $λ_Γ$ naturally associated to $Γ$. These axioms naturally extend projective absoluteness for arbitrary set-forcing--in this situation $λ_Γ=ω$--to classes $Γ$ with $λ_Γ>ω$. Unlike projective absoluteness, these higher bounded category forcing axioms do not follow from large cardinal axioms, but can be forced under mild large cardinal assumptions on $V$. We also show the existence of many classes $Γ$ with $λ_Γ=ω_1$, and giving rise to pairwise incompatible theories for $H_{ω_2}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The model-companionship spectrum of set theory, generic absoluteness, and the Continuum problem

We show that for $Π_2$-properties of second or third order arithmetic as formalized in appropriate natural signatures the apparently weaker notion of forcibility overlaps with the standard notion of consistency (assuming large cardinal axioms). Among such $Π_2$-properties we mention: the negation of the Continuum hypothesis, Souslin Hypothesis, the negation of Whitehead's conjecture on free groups, the non-existence of outer automorphisms for the Calkin algebra, etc... In particular this gives an a posteriori explanation of the success forcing (and forcing axioms) met in producing models of such properties. Our main results relate generic absoluteness theorems for second order arithmetic, Woodin's axiom $(*)$ and forcing axioms to Robinson's notion of model companionship (as applied to set theory). We also briefly outline in which ways these results provide an argument to refute the Continuum hypothesis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tameness for set theory $I$

The paper is a first of two and aims to show that (assuming large cardinals) set theory is a tractable (and we dare to say tame) first order theory when formalized in a first order signature with natural predicate symbols for the basic definable concepts of second and third order arithmetic, and appealing to the model-theoretic notions of model completeness and model companionship. Specifically we develop a general framework linking generic absoluteness results to model companionship and show that (with the required care in details) a $Π_2$-property formalized in an appropriate language for second or third order number theory is forcible from some $T\supseteq\mathsf{ZFC}+$large cardinals if and only if it is consistent with the universal fragment of $T$ if and only if it is realized in the model companion of $T$. The paper is accessible to any person who has a fair acquaintance with set theory and first order logic at the level of an under-graduate course in both topics; however bizarre this may appear (given the results we aim to prove) no knowledge of forcing or large cardinals is required to get the proofs of its main results (if one accepts as black-boxes the relevant generic absoluteness results). On the other hand familiarity with the notions of model completeness and model companionship is essential. All the necessary model-theoretic background will be given in full detail. The present work expands and systematize previous results obtained with Venturi.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tameness for set theory $II$

The paper is the second of two and shows that (assuming large cardinals) set theory is a tractable (and we dare to say tame) first order theory when formalized in a first order signature with natural predicate symbols for the basic definable concepts of second and third order arithmetic, and appealing to the model-theoretic notions of model completeness and model companionship. Specifically we use the general framework linking generic absoluteness results to model companionship introduced in the first paper to show that strong forms of Woodin's axiom $(*)$ entail that any theory $T$ extending $\mathsf{ZFC}$ by suitable large cardinal axioms has a model companion $T^*$ with respect to certain signatures $τ$ containing symbols for $Δ_0$-relations and functions, constant symbols for $ω$ and $ω_1$, a predicate symbol for the nonstationary ideal on $ω_1$, symbols for certain lightface definable universally Baire sets. Moreover $T^*$ is axiomatized by the $Π_2$-sentences $ψ$ for $τ$ such that $T$ proves that $$ L(\mathsf{UB})\models(\mathbb{P}_\max\Vdashψ^{H_{ω_2}}), $$ where $L(\mathsf{UB})$ denotes the smallest transitive model containing the universally Baire sets. Key to our results is the recent breakthrough of Asperò and Schindler establishing that a strong form of Woodin's axiom $(*)$ follows from $\mathsf{MM}^{++}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Generic absoluteness and boolean names for elements of a Polish space

It is common knowledge in the set theory community that there exists a duality relating the commutative $C^*$-algebras with the family of $B$-names for complex numbers in a boolean valued model for set theory $V^B$. Several aspects of this correlation have been considered in works of the late $1970$'s and early $1980$'s, for example by Takeuti, and by Jech. Generalizing Jech's results, we extend this duality so as to be able to describe the family of boolean names for elements of any given Polish space $Y$ (such as the complex numbers) in a boolean valued model for set theory $V^B$ as a space $C^+(X,Y)$ consisting of functions $f$ whose domain $X$ is the Stone space of $B$, and whose range is contained in $Y$ modulo a meager set. We also outline how this duality can be combined with generic absoluteness results in order to analyze, by means of forcing arguments, the theory of $C^+(X,Y)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Category forcings, $MM^{+++}$, and generic absoluteness for the theory of strong forcing axioms

We introduce a category whose objects are stationary set preserving complete boolean algebras and whose arrows are complete homomorphisms with a stationary set preserving quotient. We show that the cut of this category at a rank initial segment of the universe of height a super compact which is a limit of super compact cardinals is a stationary set preserving partial order which forces $MM^{++}$ and collapses its size to become the second uncountable cardinal. Next we argue that any of the known methods to produce a model of $MM^{++}$ collapsing a superhuge cardinal to become the second uncountable cardinal produces a model in which the cutoff of the category of stationary set preserving forcings at any rank initial segment of the universe of large enough height is forcing equivalent to a presaturated tower of normal filters. We let $MM^{+++}$ denote this statement and we prove that the theory of $L(Ord^{ω_1})$ with parameters in $P(ω_1)$ is generically invariant for stationary set preserving forcings that preserve $MM^{+++}$. Finally we argue that the work of Larson and Asperó shows that this is a next to optimal generalization to the Chang model $L(Ord^{ω_1})$ of Woodin's generic absoluteness results for the Chang model $L(Ord^ω)$. It remains open whether $MM^{+++}$ and $MM^{++}$ are equivalent axioms modulo large cardinals and whether $MM^{++}$ suffices to prove the same generic absoluteness results for the Chang model $L(Ord^{ω_1})$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Boolean Algebraic Approach to Semiproper Iterations

These notes present a compact and self-contained approach to iterated forcing with a particular emphasis on semiproper forcing. We tried to make our presentation accessible to any scholar who has some familiarity with forcing and boolean valued models and full details of all proofs are given. We focus our presentation using the boolean algebra language and defining an iteration system as a directed and commutative system of complete and injective homomorphisms between complete and atomless boolean algebras. It is well known that the boolean algebra approach to forcing and iterations is fully equivalent to the standard one. While there are several monographs where forcing is introduced by means of boolean valued models, to our knowledge no detailed account of iterated forcing following a boolean algebraic approach has yet appeared. We believe that this different approach is fruitful since the richness of the algebraic language simplifies many calculations and definitions, among which that of RCS-limits. Some of the advantages of this approach have been already outlined by Donder and Fuchs in http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9207204. The first part of these notes present the general framework needed to develop the notion of limit of an iterated system of forcings in the boolean algebraic language. The second part contains a proof of the main result of Shelah on semiproper iterations, i.e. that RCS-limit of semiproper iterations are semiproper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Guessing models and generalized Laver diamond

We analyze the notion of guessing model, a way to assign combinatorial properties to arbitrary regular cardinals. Guessing models can be used, in combination with inaccessibility, to characterize various large cardinals axioms, ranging from supercompactness to rank-to-rank embeddings. The majority of these large cardinals properties can be defined in terms of suitable elementary embeddings j\colon V_γ\to V_λ. One key observation is that such embeddings are uniquely determined by the image structures j [ V_γ]\prec V_λ. These structures will be the prototypes guessing models. We shall show, using guessing models M, how to prove for the ordinal κ_M=j_M (\crit(j_M)) (where π_M is the transitive collapse of M and j_M is its inverse) many of the combinatorial properties that we can prove for the cardinal j(\crit(j)) using the structure j[V_γ]\prec V_{j(γ)}. κ_M will always be a regular cardinal, but consistently can be a successor. Guessing models M with κ_M=\aleph_2 exist assuming the proper forcing axiom PFA. By means of these models we shall introduce a new structural property of models of PFA: the existence of a "Laver function" f : \aleph_2 \to H_{\aleph_2} sharing the same features of the usual Laver functions f :κ\to H_κprovided by a supercompact cardinal κ. Further applications of our analysis will be proofs of the singular cardinal hypothesis and of the failure of the square principle assuming the existence of guessing models. In particular the failure of square shows that the existence of guessing models is a very strong assumption in terms of large cardinal strength.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Martin's Maximum and tower forcing

There are several examples in the literature showing that compactness-like properties of a cardinal $κ$ cause poor behavior of some generic ultrapowers which have critical point $κ$ (Burke \cite{MR1472122} when $κ$ is a supercompact cardinal; Foreman-Magidor \cite{MR1359154} when $κ= ω_2$ in the presence of strong forcing axioms). We prove more instances of this phenomenon. First, the Reflection Principle (RP) implies that if $\vec{\mathcal{I}}$ is a tower of ideals which concentrates on the class $GIC_{ω_1}$ of $ω_1$-guessing, internally club sets, then $\vec{\mathcal{I}}$ is not presaturated (a set is $ω_1$-guessing iff its transitive collapse has the $ω_1$-approximation property as defined in Hamkins \cite{MR2540935}). This theorem, combined with work from \cite{VW_ISP}, shows that if $PFA^+$ or $MM$ holds and there is an inaccessible cardinal, then there is a tower with critical point $ω_2$ which is not presaturated; moreover this tower is significantly different from the non-presaturated tower already known (by Foreman-Magidor \cite{MR1359154}) to exist in all models of Martin's Maximum. The conjunction of the Strong Reflection Principle (SRP) and the Tree Property at $ω_2$ has similar implications for towers of ideals which concentrate on the wider class $GIS_{ω_1}$ of $ω_1$-guessing, internally stationary sets. Finally, we show that the word "presaturated" cannot be replaced by "precipitous" in the theorems above: Martin's Maximum (which implies SRP and the Tree Property at $ω_2$) is consistent with a precipitous tower on $GIC_{ω_1}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On the consistency strength of the proper forcing axiom

Recently the second author introduced combinatorial principles that characterize supercompactness for inaccessible cardinals but can also hold true for small cardinals. We prove that the proper forcing axiom PFA implies these principles hold for $ω_2$. Using this, we argue to show that any of the known methods for forcing models of PFA from a large cardinal assumption requires a strongly compact cardinal. If one forces PFA using a proper forcing, then we get the optimal result that a supercompact cardinal is necessary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access