Paper detail

Growth envelopes of some variable and mixed function spaces

We study unboundedness properties of functions belonging Lebesgue and Lorentz spaces with variable and mixed norms using growth envelopes. Our results extend the ones for the corresponding classical spaces in a natural way. In the case of spaces with mixed norms it turns out that the unboundedness in the worst direction, i.e., in the direction where $p_{i}$ is the smallest, is crucial. More precisely, the growth envelope is given by $E_G(L_{\vec{p}}(Ω)) = (t^{-1/\min\{p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d} \}},\min\{p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d} \})$ for mixed Lebesgue and $E_G(L_{\vec{p},q}(Ω)) = (t^{-1/\min\{p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d} \}},q)$ for mixed Lorentz spaces, respectively. For the variable Lebesgue spaces we obtain $E_G(L_{p(\cdot)}(Ω)) = (t^{-1/p_{-}},p_{-})$, where $p_{-}$ is the essential infimum of $p(\cdot)$, subject to some further assumptions. Similarly, for the variable Lorentz space it holds $E_G(L_{p(\cdot),q}(Ω)) = (t^{-1/p_{-}},q)$. The growth envelope is used for Hardy-type inequalities and limiting embeddings. In particular, as a by-product we determine the smallest classical Lebesgue (Lorentz) space which contains a fixed mixed or variable Lebesgue (Lorentz) space, respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.