Paper detail

Ground-State Phase Diagram of the 1D t-J model

We examine the ground-state phase diagram of the t-J model in one dimension by means of the Density Matrix Renormalization Group. This model is characterized by a rich phase diagram as a function of the exchange interaction J and the density n, displaying Luttinger-liquid (LL) behavior both of repulsive and attractive (i.e. superconducting) nature, a spin-gap phase, and phase-separation. The phase boundaries separating the repulsive from the attractive LL phase as J is increased, and also the boundaries of the spin-gap region at low densities, and phase-separation at even larger J, are determined on the basis of correlation functions and energy-gaps. In particular, we shed light on a contradiction between variational and renormalization-group (RG) results about the extent of the spin-gap phase, that results larger than the variational but smaller than the RG one. Furthermore, we show that the spin gap can reach a sizable value (~ 0.1 t) at low enough filling, such that preformed pairs should be observable at temperatures below these energy scales. No evidence for a phase with clustering of more than two particles is found on approaching phase separation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.