Paper detail

Ground State Energy Calculations of the ν=1/2 and the ν=5/2 FQHE System

We reconsider energy calculations of the spin polarized $ν=1/2$ Chern-Simons theory. We show that one has to be careful in the definition of the Chern-Simons path integral in order to avoid an IR divergent magnetic ground state energy in RPA as in \cite{di1}. We correct the path integral and get a well behaved magnetic energy by considering the energy of the maximal divergent graphs as well as the Hartree-Fock graphs. Furthermore, we consider the $ν=1/2$ and the $ν=5/2$ system with spin degrees of freedom. In doing this we formulate a Chern-Simons theory of the $ν=5/2$ system by transforming the interaction operator to the next lower Landau level. We calculate the Coulomb energy of the spin polarized as well as the spin unpolarized $ν=1/2$ and the $ν=5/2$ system as a function of the interaction strength in RPA. These energies are in good agreement with numerical simulations of interacting electrons in the first as well as in the second Landau level. Furthermore, we calculate the compressibility, the effective mass and the excitations of the spin polarized $ν=2+1/\tildeϕ$ systems where $\tildeϕ$ is an even number.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.