Paper detail

Gromov--Hausdorff Distance, Irreducible Correspondences, Steiner Problem, and Minimal Fillings

We introduce irreducible correspondences that enables us to calculate the Gromov--Hausdorff distances effectively. By means of these correspondences, we show that the set of all metric spaces each consisting of no more than $3$ points is isometric to a polyhedral cone in the space $R^3$ endowed with the maximum norm. We prove that for any $3$-point metric space such that all the triangle inequalities are strict in it, there exists a neighborhood such that the Steiner minimal trees (in Gromov-Hausdorff space) with boundaries from this neighborhood are minimal fillings, i.e., it is impossible to decrease the lengths of these trees by isometrically embedding their boundaries into any other ambient metric space. On the other hand, we construct an example of $3$-point boundary whose points are $3$-point metric spaces such that its Steiner minimal tree in the Gromov-Hausdorff space is not a minimal filling. The latter proves that the Steiner subratio of the Gromov-Hausdorff space is less than 1. The irreducible correspondences enabled us to create a quick algorithm for calculating the Gromov-Hausdorff distance between finite metric spaces. We carried out a numerical experiment and obtained more precise upper estimate on the Steiner subratio: we have shown that it is less than $0.857$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.