Paper detail

Gravitational field of a slowly rotating black hole with phantom global monopole

We present a slowly rotating black hole with phantom global monopole by solving Einstein's field equation and find that presence of global monopole changes the structure of black hole. The metric coefficient $g_{tϕ}$ contains hypergeometric function of the polar coordinate $r$, which is more complex than that in the usual slowly rotating black hole. The energy scale of symmetry breaking $η$ affects the black hole horizon and a deficit solid angle. Especially, the solid angle is surplus rather than deficit for a black hole with the phantom global monopole. We also study the correction originating from the global monopole to the angular velocity of the horizon $Ω_H$, the Kepler's third law, the innermost stable circular orbit and the radiative efficiency $ε$ in the thin accretion disk model. Our results also show that for the phantom black hole the radiative efficiency $ε$ is positive only for the case $η\leq η_c$. The threshold value $η_c$ increases with the rotation parameter $a$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.