Paper detail

Gravitational Brownian motion as inhomogeneous diffusion: black hole populations in globular clusters

Recent theoretical and numerical developments supported by observational evidence strongly suggest that many globular clusters host a black hole (BH) population in their centers. This stands in contrast to the prior long-standing belief that a BH subcluster would evaporate after undergoing core collapse and decoupling from the cluster. In this work, we propose that the inhomogeneous Brownian motion generated by fluctuations of the stellar gravitational field may act as a mechanism adding a stabilizing pressure to a BH population. We argue that the diffusion equation for Brownian motion in an inhomogeneous medium with spatially varying diffusion coefficient and temperature, which was first discovered by Van Kampen, also applies to self-gravitating systems. Applying the stationary phase space probability distribution to a single BH immersed in a Plummer globular cluster, we infer that it may wander as far as $\sim 0.05,\,0.1,\,0.5{\rm pc}$ for a mass of $m_{\rm b} \sim 10^3,\,10^2,\,10{\rm M}_\odot$, respectively. Furthermore, we find that the fluctuations of a fixed stellar mean gravitational field are sufficient to stabilize a BH population above the Spitzer instability threshold. Nevertheless, we identify an instability whose onset depends on the Spitzer parameter, $S = (M_{\rm b}/M_\star) (m_{\rm b}/m_\star)^{3/2} ,$ and parameter $B = ρ_{\rm b}(0) (4πr_c^3/M_b)(m_\star/m_{\rm b})^{3/2} $, where $ρ_{\rm b}(0)$ is the Brownian population central density. For a Plummer sphere, the instability occurs at $(B,S) = (140,0.25)$. For $B > 140,$ we get very cuspy BH subcluster profiles that are unstable with regard to the support of fluctuations alone. For $S > 0.25,$ there is no evidence of any stationary states for the BH population based on the inhomogeneous diffusion equation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.