Paper detail

Grassmannians in the Lattice points of Dilations of the Standard Simplex

A remarkable connection between the cohomology ring ${\rm H^{\ast}(Gr}(d, d+r),\Z)$ of the Grasssmannian ${\rm Gr}(d,d+r)$ and the lattice points of the dilation $rΔ_{d}$ of the standard d-simplex is investigated. The natural grading on the cohomology induces different gradings of the lattice points of $rΔ_{d}$. This leads to different refinements of the Ehrhart polynomial $L_{Δ_{d}}(r)$ of the standard $d$-simplex. We study two of these refinements which are defined by the weights $(1,1,\dots,1)$ and $(1,2,\dots, d)$. One of the refinements interprets the Poincaré polynomial ${\rm P(Gr}(d,d+r),z)$ as the counting of the lattice points which lie on the slicing hyperplanes of the dilation $rΔ_d$. Therefore, on the combinatorial level the Poincaré polynomial of the Grassmannian Gr$(d,d+r)$ is a refinement of the Ehrhart polynomial $L_{Δ_d}(r)$ of the standard $d$-simplex $Δ_{d}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.