Paper detail

Graphs with constant adjacency dimension

For a set W of vertices and a vertex v in a graph G, the k-vector r2(v|W) = (aG(v,w1),...,aG(v,wk)) is the adjacency representation of v with respect to W, where W = {w1,...,wk} and aG(x,y) is the minimum of 2 and the distance between the vertices x and y. The set W is an adjacency resolving set for G if distinct vertices of G have distinct adjacency representations with respect to W. The minimum cardinality of an adjacency resolving set for G is its adjacency dimension. It is clear that the adjacency dimension of an n-vertex graph G is between 1 and n-1. The graphs with adjacency dimension 1 and n-1 are known. All graphs with adjacency dimension 2, and all n-vertex graphs with adjacency dimension n-2 are studied in this paper. In terms of the diameter and order of G, a sharp upper bound is found for adjacency dimension of G. Also, a sharp lower bound for adjacency dimension of G is obtained in terms of order of G. Using these two bounds, all graphs with adjacency dimension 2, and all n-vertex graphs with adjacency dimension n-2 are characterized.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.