Paper detail

Graphlet characteristics in directed networks

A number of network structural characteristics have recently been the subject of particularly intense research, including degree distributions, community structure, and various measures of vertex centrality, to mention only a few. Vertices may have attributes associated with them; for example, properties of proteins in protein-protein interaction networks, users' social network profiles, or authors' publication histories in co-authorship networks. In a network, two vertices might be considered similar if they have similar attributes (features, properties), or they can be considered similar based solely on the network structure. Similarity of this type is called structural similarity, to distinguish it from properties similarity, social similarity, textual similarity, functional similarity or other similarity types found in networks. Here we focus on the similarity problem by computing (1) for each vertex a vector of structural features, called signature vector, based on the number of graphlets associated with the vertex, and (2) for the network its graphlet correlation matrix, measuring graphlets dependencies and hence revealing unknown organizational principles of the network. We found that real-world networks generally have very different structural characteristics resulting in different graphlet correlation matrices. In particular, the graphlet correlation matrix of the brain effective network is computed for 40 healthy subjects and common (present in more than 70 percent subjects) dependencies are raveled. Thus, negative correlations are found for 2-node graphlets and 3-node graphlets that are wedges and positive correlations are found only for 3-node graphlets that are triangles. Graphlets characteristics in directed networks could further significantly increase our understanding of real-world networks.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.