Paper detail

Graph Gain: A Concave-Hull Based Volumetric Gain for Robotic Exploration

The existing volumetric gain for robotic exploration is calculated in the 3D occupancy map, while the sampling-based exploration method is extended in the reachable (free) space. The inconsistency between them makes the existing calculation of volumetric gain inappropriate for a complete exploration of the environment. To address this issue, we propose a concave-hull based volumetric gain in a sampling-based exploration framework. The concave hull is constructed based on the viewpoints generated by Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) and the nodes that fail to expand. All space outside this concave hull is considered unknown. The volumetric gain is calculated based on the viewpoints configuration rather than using the occupancy map. With the new volumetric gain, robots can avoid inefficient or even erroneous exploration behavior caused by the inappropriateness of existing volumetric gain calculation methods. Our exploration method is evaluated against the existing state-of-the-art RRT-based method in a benchmark environment. In the evaluated environment, the average running time of our method is about 38.4% of the existing state-of-the-art method and our method is more robust.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.