Paper detail

Graph embeddings for Abusive Language Detection

Abusive behaviors are common on online social networks. The increasing frequency of antisocial behaviors forces the hosts of online platforms to find new solutions to address this problem. Automating the moderation process has thus received a lot of interest in the past few years. Various methods have been proposed, most based on the exchanged content, and one relying on the structure and dynamics of the conversation. It has the advantage of being languageindependent, however it leverages a hand-crafted set of topological measures which are computationally expensive and not necessarily suitable to all situations. In the present paper, we propose to use recent graph embedding approaches to automatically learn representations of conversational graphs depicting message exchanges. We compare two categories: node vs. whole-graph embeddings. We experiment with a total of 8 approaches and apply them to a dataset of online messages. We also study more precisely which aspects of the graph structure are leveraged by each approach. Our study shows that the representation produced by certain embeddings captures the information conveyed by specific topological measures, but misses out other aspects.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.