Paper detail

Graph eigenvectors, fundamental weights and centrality metrics for nodes in networks

Several expressions for the $j$-th component $\left( x_{k}\right)_{j}$ of the $k$-th eigenvector $x_{k}$ of a symmetric matrix $A$ belonging to eigenvalue $λ_{k}$ and normalized as $x_{k}^{T}x_{k}=1$ are presented. In particular, the expression \[ \left( x_{k}\right)_{j}^{2}=-\frac{1}{c_{A}^{\prime}\left( λ_{k}\right) }\det\left( A_{\backslash\left\{ j\right\} }-λ_{k}I\right) \] where $c_{A}\left( λ\right) =\det\left( A-λI\right) $ is the characteristic polynomial of $A$, $c_{A}^{\prime}\left( λ\right) =\frac{dc_{A}\left( λ\right) }{dλ}$ and $A_{\backslash\left\{ j\right\} }$ is obtained from $A$ by removal of row $j$ and column $j$, suggests us to consider the square eigenvector component as a graph centrality metric for node $j$ that reflects the impact of the removal of node $j$ from the graph at an eigenfrequency/eigenvalue $λ_{k}$ of a graph related matrix (such as the adjacency or Laplacian matrix). Removal of nodes in a graph relates to the robustness of a graph. The set of such nodal centrality metrics, the squared eigenvector components $\left( x_{k}\right)_{j}^{2}$ of the adjacency matrix over all eigenvalue $λ_{k}$ for each node $j$, is 'ideal' in the sense of being complete, \emph{almost} uncorrelated and mathematically precisely defined and computable. Fundamental weights (column sum of $X$) and dual fundamental weights (row sum of $X$) are introduced as spectral metrics that condense information embedded in the orthogonal eigenvector matrix $X$, with elements $X_{ij}=\left( x_{j}\right)_{i}$. In addition to the criterion {\em If the algebraic connectivity is positive, then the graph is connected}, we found an alternative condition: {\em If $\min_{1\leq k\leq N}\left( λ_{k}^{2}(A)\right) =d_{\min}$, then the graph is disconnected.}

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.