Paper detail

Graph Contrastive Learning with Personalized Augmentation

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) has emerged as an effective tool for learning unsupervised representations of graphs. The key idea is to maximize the agreement between two augmented views of each graph via data augmentation. Existing GCL models mainly focus on applying \textit{identical augmentation strategies} for all graphs within a given scenario. However, real-world graphs are often not monomorphic but abstractions of diverse natures. Even within the same scenario (e.g., macromolecules and online communities), different graphs might need diverse augmentations to perform effective GCL. Thus, blindly augmenting all graphs without considering their individual characteristics may undermine the performance of GCL arts.To deal with this, we propose the first principled framework, termed as \textit{G}raph contrastive learning with \textit{P}ersonalized \textit{A}ugmentation (GPA), to advance conventional GCL by allowing each graph to choose its own suitable augmentation operations.In essence, GPA infers tailored augmentation strategies for each graph based on its topology and node attributes via a learnable augmentation selector, which is a plug-and-play module and can be effectively trained with downstream GCL models end-to-end. Extensive experiments across 11 benchmark graphs from different types and domains demonstrate the superiority of GPA against state-of-the-art competitors.Moreover, by visualizing the learned augmentation distributions across different types of datasets, we show that GPA can effectively identify the most suitable augmentations for each graph based on its characteristics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.