Paper detail

GRAFT-ATHENA: Self-Improving Agentic Teams for Autonomous Discovery and Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms

Scientific discovery can be modeled as a sequence of probabilistic decisions that map physical problems to numerical solutions. Recent agentic AI systems automate individual scientific tasks by orchestrating LLM-driven planners, solvers, and evaluators. Each method is a combination of methodological actions, with many viable combinations for any given problem and structural dependencies between choices. However, existing frameworks treat each problem in isolation, with no shared substrate to accumulate methodological experience across domains. Here we show that GRAFT-ATHENA, a self-improving agentic framework, learns from past problems and autonomously expands its own action space across diverse domains. GRAFT (Graph Reduction to Adaptive Factored Trees) projects combinatorial decision spaces into factored probabilistic trees in which each method is a single path, taking the parameter footprint from exponential to linear. In the lineage of classical Bayesian networks, the factorization is an $I$-map of the policy, and the resulting paths embed as unique fingerprints in a metric space whose closeness lets each new problem learn from similar past ones. On canonical physics-informed machine learning (PIML) benchmarks, GRAFT-ATHENA improves over human and prior agentic baselines, and on production solvers, it tackles complex engineering problems such as reconstructing Mach-10 flow over the Apollo Command Module from a 1968 report and recovering shear-thinning blood-cell rheology. Notably, the system grows its own knowledge substrate, autonomously proposing regularization constraints for ill-posed inverse problems and discovering new numerical methods such as a spectral PINN with exponential convergence. These results provide a foundation for autonomous laboratories that grow more capable with every problem they solve.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.