Paper detail

GPA: A statistical approach to prioritizing GWAS results by integrating pleiotropy information and annotation data

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) suggests that a complex disease is typically affected by many genetic variants with small or moderate effects. Identification of these risk variants remains to be a very challenging problem. Traditional approaches focusing on a single GWAS dataset alone ignore relevant information that could potentially improve our ability to detect these variants. We proposed a novel statistical approach, named GPA, to performing integrative analysis of multiple GWAS datasets and functional annotations. Hypothesis testing procedures were developed to facilitate statistical inference of pleiotropy and enrichment of functional annotation. We applied our approach to perform systematic analysis of five psychiatric disorders. Not only did GPA identify many weak signals missed by the original single phenotype analysis, but also revealed interesting genetic architectures of these disorders. We also applied GPA to the bladder cancer GWAS data with the ENCODE DNase-seq data from 125 cell lines and showed that GPA can detect cell lines that are more biologically relevant to the phenotype of interest.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.