Paper detail

GLYFE: Review and Benchmark of Personalized Glucose Predictive Models in Type-1 Diabetes

Due to the sensitive nature of diabetes-related data, preventing them from being shared between studies, progress in the field of glucose prediction is hard to assess. To address this issue, we present GLYFE (GLYcemia Forecasting Evaluation), a benchmark of machine-learning-based glucose-predictive models. To ensure the reproducibility of the results and the usability of the benchmark in the future, we provide extensive details about the data flow. Two datasets are used, the first comprising 10 in-silico adults from the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Metabolic Simulator (T1DMS) and the second being made of 6 real type-1 diabetic patients coming from the OhioT1DM dataset. The predictive models are personalized to the patient and evaluated on 3 different prediction horizons (30, 60, and 120 minutes) with metrics assessing their accuracy and clinical acceptability. The results of nine different models coming from the glucose-prediction literature are presented. First, they show that standard autoregressive linear models are outclassed by kernel-based non-linear ones and neural networks. In particular, the support vector regression model stands out, being at the same time one of the most accurate and clinically acceptable model. Finally, the relative performances of the models are the same for both datasets. This shows that, even though data simulated by T1DMS are not fully representative of real-world data, they can be used to assess the forecasting ability of the glucose-predictive models. Those results serve as a basis of comparison for future studies. In a field where data are hard to obtain, and where the comparison of results from different studies is often irrelevant, GLYFE gives the opportunity of gathering researchers around a standardized common environment.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.