Paper detail

Glucose Control, Sleep, Obesity, and Real-World Driver Safety at Stop Intersections in Type 1 Diabetes

Background: Diabetes is associated with obesity, poor glucose control and sleep dysfunction which impair cognitive and psychomotor functions, and, in turn, increase driver risk. How this risk plays out in the real-world driving settings is terra incognita. Addressing this knowledge gap requires comprehensive observations of diabetes driver behavior and physiology in challenging settings where crashes are more likely to occur, such as stop-controlled traffic intersections, as in the current study of drivers with Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM). Methods: 32 active drivers from around Omaha, NE participated in 4-week, real-world study. Each participant's own vehicle was instrumented with an advanced telematics and camera system collecting driving sensor data and video. Videos were analyzed using computer vision models detecting traffic elements to identify stop signs. Stop sign detections and driver stopping trajectories were clustered to geolocate and extract driver-visited stop intersections. Driver videos were then annotated to record stopping behavior and key traffic characteristics. Stops were categorized as safe or unsafe based on traffic law. Results: Mixed effects logistic regression models examined how stopping behavior (safe vs. unsafe) in T1DM drivers was affected by 1) abnormal sleep, 2) obesity, and 3) poor glucose control. Model results indicate that one standard deviation increase in BMI (~7 points) in T1DM drivers associated with a 14.96 increase in unsafe stopping odds compared to similar controls. Abnormal sleep and glucose control were not associated with increased unsafe stopping. Conclusion: This study links chronic patterns of abnormal T1DM driver physiology, sleep, and health to driver safety risk at intersections, advancing models to identify real-world safety risk in diabetes drivers for clinical intervention and development of in-vehicle safety assistance technology.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.