Researcher profile

Jennifer Merickel

Jennifer Merickel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Glucose Control, Sleep, Obesity, and Real-World Driver Safety at Stop Intersections in Type 1 Diabetes

Background: Diabetes is associated with obesity, poor glucose control and sleep dysfunction which impair cognitive and psychomotor functions, and, in turn, increase driver risk. How this risk plays out in the real-world driving settings is terra incognita. Addressing this knowledge gap requires comprehensive observations of diabetes driver behavior and physiology in challenging settings where crashes are more likely to occur, such as stop-controlled traffic intersections, as in the current study of drivers with Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM). Methods: 32 active drivers from around Omaha, NE participated in 4-week, real-world study. Each participant's own vehicle was instrumented with an advanced telematics and camera system collecting driving sensor data and video. Videos were analyzed using computer vision models detecting traffic elements to identify stop signs. Stop sign detections and driver stopping trajectories were clustered to geolocate and extract driver-visited stop intersections. Driver videos were then annotated to record stopping behavior and key traffic characteristics. Stops were categorized as safe or unsafe based on traffic law. Results: Mixed effects logistic regression models examined how stopping behavior (safe vs. unsafe) in T1DM drivers was affected by 1) abnormal sleep, 2) obesity, and 3) poor glucose control. Model results indicate that one standard deviation increase in BMI (~7 points) in T1DM drivers associated with a 14.96 increase in unsafe stopping odds compared to similar controls. Abnormal sleep and glucose control were not associated with increased unsafe stopping. Conclusion: This study links chronic patterns of abnormal T1DM driver physiology, sleep, and health to driver safety risk at intersections, advancing models to identify real-world safety risk in diabetes drivers for clinical intervention and development of in-vehicle safety assistance technology.

preprint2022arXiv

Sugar and Stops in Drivers with Insulin-Dependent Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes is a major public health challenge worldwide. Abnormal physiology in diabetes, particularly hypoglycemia, can cause driver impairments that affect safe driving. While diabetes driver safety has been previously researched, few studies link real-time physiologic changes in drivers with diabetes to objective real-world driver safety, particularly at high-risk areas like intersections. To address this, we investigated the role of acute physiologic changes in drivers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) on safe stopping at stop intersections. 18 T1DM drivers (21-52 years, mean = 31.2 years) and 14 controls (21-55 years, mean = 33.4 years) participated in a 4-week naturalistic driving study. At induction, each participant's vehicle was fitted with a camera and sensor system to collect driving data. Video was processed with computer vision algorithms detecting traffic elements. Stop intersections were geolocated with clustering methods, state intersection databases, and manual review. Videos showing driver stop intersection approaches were extracted and manually reviewed to classify stopping behavior (full, rolling, and no stop) and intersection traffic characteristics. Mixed-effects logistic regression models determined how diabetes driver stopping safety (safe vs. unsafe stop) was affected by 1) disease and 2) at-risk, acute physiology (hypo- and hyperglycemia). Diabetes drivers who were acutely hyperglycemic had 2.37 increased odds of unsafe stopping (95% CI: 1.26-4.47, p = 0.008) compared to those with normal physiology. Acute hypoglycemia did not associate with unsafe stopping (p = 0.537), however the lower frequency of hypoglycemia (vs. hyperglycemia) warrants a larger sample of drivers to investigate this effect. Critically, presence of diabetes alone did not associate with unsafe stopping, underscoring the need to evaluate driver physiology in licensing guidelines.