Paper detail

Globally synchronized oscillations in complex cyclic games

The Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) game and its generalizations with ${\cal S}>3$ species are well studied models for cyclically interacting populations. Four is, however, the minimum number of species that, by allowing other interactions beyond the single, cyclic loop, breaks both the full intransitivity of the food graph and the one predator, one prey symmetry. Lütz {\it et al} (J. Theor. Biol. {\bf 317} (2013) 286) have shown the existence, on a square lattice, of two distinct phases, with either four or three coexisting species. In both phases, each agent is eventually replaced by one of its predators but these strategy oscillations remain localized as long as the interactions are short ranged. Distant regions may be either out of phase or cycling through different food web subloops (if any). Here we show that upon replacing a minimum fraction $Q_c$ of the short range interactions by long range ones, there is a Hopf bifurcation and global oscillations become stable. Surprisingly, to build such long distance, global synchronization, the four species coexistence phase requires less long range interactions than the three species phase, while one would naively expect the contrary. Moreover, deviations from highly homogeneous conditions ($χ=0$ or 1) increase $Q_c$ and the more heterogeneous is the food web, the harder the synchronization is. By further increasing $Q$, while the three species phase remains stable, the four species one has a transition to an absorbing, single species state. The existence of a phase with global oscillations for ${\cal S}>3$, when the interaction graph has multiple subloops and several possible local cycles, lead to the conjecture that global oscillations are a general characteristic, even for large, realistic food webs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.