Paper detail

Global rates of convergence in log-concave density estimation

The estimation of a log-concave density on $\mathbb{R}^d$ represents a central problem in the area of nonparametric inference under shape constraints. In this paper, we study the performance of log-concave density estimators with respect to global loss functions, and adopt a minimax approach. We first show that no statistical procedure based on a sample of size $n$ can estimate a log-concave density with respect to the squared Hellinger loss function with supremum risk smaller than order $n^{-4/5}$, when $d=1$, and order $n^{-2/(d+1)}$ when $d \geq 2$. In particular, this reveals a sense in which, when $d \geq 3$, log-concave density estimation is fundamentally more challenging than the estimation of a density with two bounded derivatives (a problem to which it has been compared). Second, we show that for $d \leq 3$, the Hellinger $ε$-bracketing entropy of a class of log-concave densities with small mean and covariance matrix close to the identity grows like $\max\{ε^{-d/2},ε^{-(d-1)}\}$ (up to a logarithmic factor when $d=2$). This enables us to prove that when $d \leq 3$ the log-concave maximum likelihood estimator achieves the minimax optimal rate (up to logarithmic factors when $d = 2,3$) with respect to squared Hellinger loss.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.