Paper detail

Geometry of energy landscapes and the optimizability of deep neural networks

Deep neural networks are workhorse models in machine learning with multiple layers of non-linear functions composed in series. Their loss function is highly non-convex, yet empirically even gradient descent minimisation is sufficient to arrive at accurate and predictive models. It is hitherto unknown why are deep neural networks easily optimizable. We analyze the energy landscape of a spin glass model of deep neural networks using random matrix theory and algebraic geometry. We analytically show that the multilayered structure holds the key to optimizability: Fixing the number of parameters and increasing network depth, the number of stationary points in the loss function decreases, minima become more clustered in parameter space, and the tradeoff between the depth and width of minima becomes less severe. Our analytical results are numerically verified through comparison with neural networks trained on a set of classical benchmark datasets. Our model uncovers generic design principles of machine learning models.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.