Paper detail

Geometrical Ambiguity of Pair Statistics. II. Heterogeneous Media

In a previous paper [Jiao, Stillinger and Torquato, PRE 81, 011105 (2010)], we considered the geometrical ambiguity of pair statistics associated with point configurations. Here we focus on the analogous problem for heterogeneous media (materials). The complex structures of heterogeneous media are usually characterized via statistical descriptors, such as the $n$-point correlation function $S_n$. An intricate inverse problem of practical importance is to what extent a medium can be reconstructed from the two-point correlation function $S_2$ of a target medium. Recently, general claims of the uniqueness of reconstructions using $S_2$ have been made based on numerical studies. Here, we provide a systematic approach to characterize the geometrical ambiguity of $S_2$ for both continuous two-phase heterogeneous media and their digitized representations in a mathematically precise way. In particular, we derive the exact conditions for the case where two distinct media possess identical $S_2$. The degeneracy conditions are given in terms of integral and algebraic equations for continuous media and their digitized representations, respectively. By examining these equations and constructing their rigorous solutions for specific examples, we conclusively show that in general $S_2$ is indeed not sufficient information to uniquely determine the structure of the medium, which is consistent with the results of our recent study on heterogeneous media reconstruction [Jiao, Stillinger and Torquato, PNAS 106, 17634 (2009)]. The uniqueness issue of multiphase media reconstructions and additional structural information required to characterize heterogeneous media are discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.