Paper detail

Geometric sensitivity of random matrix results: consequences for shrinkage estimators of covariance and related statistical methods

Shrinkage estimators of covariance are an important tool in modern applied and theoretical statistics. They play a key role in regularized estimation problems, such as ridge regression (aka Tykhonov regularization), regularized discriminant analysis and a variety of optimization problems. In this paper, we bring to bear the tools of random matrix theory to understand their behavior, and in particular, that of quadratic forms involving inverses of those estimators, which are important in practice. We use very mild assumptions compared to the usual assumptions made in random matrix theory, requiring only mild conditions on the moments of linear and quadratic forms in our random vectors. In particular, we show that our results apply for instance to log-normal data, which are of interest in financial applications. Our study highlights the relative sensitivity of random matrix results (and their practical consequences) to geometric assumptions which are often implicitly made by random matrix theorists and may not be relevant in data analytic practice.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.