Paper detail

Geometric instability of out of distribution data across autoencoder architecture

We study the map learned by a family of autoencoders trained on MNIST, and evaluated on ten different data sets created by the random selection of pixel values according to ten different distributions. Specifically, we study the eigenvalues of the Jacobians defined by the weight matrices of the autoencoder at each training and evaluation point. For high enough latent dimension, we find that each autoencoder reconstructs all the evaluation data sets as similar \emph{generalized characters}, but that this reconstructed \emph{generalized character} changes across autoencoder. Eigenvalue analysis shows that even when the reconstructed image appears to be an MNIST character for all out of distribution data sets, not all have latent representations that are close to the latent representation of MNIST characters. All told, the eigenvalue analysis demonstrated a great deal of geometric instability of the autoencoder both as a function on out of distribution inputs, and across architectures on the same set of inputs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.