Paper detail

Geometric Graph Learning with Extended Atom-Types Features for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Understanding and accurately predicting protein-ligand binding affinity are essential in the drug design and discovery process. At present, machine learning-based methodologies are gaining popularity as a means of predicting binding affinity due to their efficiency and accuracy, as well as the increasing availability of structural and binding affinity data for protein-ligand complexes. In biomolecular studies, graph theory has been widely applied since graphs can be used to model molecules or molecular complexes in a natural manner. In the present work, we upgrade the graph-based learners for the study of protein-ligand interactions by integrating extensive atom types such as SYBYL and extended connectivity interactive features (ECIF) into multiscale weighted colored graphs (MWCG). By pairing with the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) machine learning algorithm, our approach results in two different methods, namely $^\text{sybyl}\text{GGL}$-Score and $^\text{ecif}\text{GGL}$-Score. Both of our models are extensively validated in their scoring power using three commonly used benchmark datasets in the drug design area, namely CASF-2007, CASF-2013, and CASF-2016. The performance of our best model $^\text{sybyl}\text{GGL}$-Score is compared with other state-of-the-art models in the binding affinity prediction for each benchmark. While both of our models achieve state-of-the-art results, the SYBYL atom-type model $^\text{sybyl}\text{GGL}$-Score outperforms other methods by a wide margin in all benchmarks.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.