Paper detail

Geometric criteria for the absence of effective many-body interactions in nonadditive hard particle mixtures

We consider a mixture of small and big classical particles in arbitrary spatial dimensions interacting via hard-body potentials with non-additive excluded-volume interactions. In particular, we focus on variants of the Asakura--Oosawa (AO) model where the interaction between the small particles is neglected but the big-small and big-big interactions are present and can be condensed into an effective depletion interaction among the big particles alone. The original AO model involves hard spherical particles in three spatial dimensions with interaction diameters $σ_\text{pp}=0$, $σ_\text{cc}>0$ and $σ_\text{pc}>σ_\text{cc}/2$ respectively, where $σ_{ij}$ with $\{i,j\}=\{\text{p},\text{c}\}$ (indicating the physical interpretation of the small and big particles as polymers (p) and colloids (c), respectively) is the minimum possible center-to-center distance between particle $i$ and particle $j$ allowed by the excluded-volume constraints. It is common knowledge that there are only pairwise effective depletion interactions between the big particles if the geometric condition $σ_\text{pc}/σ_\text{cc} < 1/\sqrt{3}$ is fulfilled. In this case, triplet and higher-order many body interactions are vanishing and the equilibrium statistics of the binary mixture can exactly be mapped onto that of an effective one-component system with the effective depletion pair-potential. Here we prove this geometric criterion rigorously and generalize it to polydisperse mixtures and to anisotropic particle shapes in any dimension, providing geometric criteria sufficient to guarantee the absence of triplet and higher-order many body interactions. For an external hard wall confining the full mixture, we also give criteria which guarantee that the system can be mapped onto one with effective external one-body interactions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.