Paper detail

Generator evaluator-selector net for panoptic image segmentation and splitting unfamiliar objects into parts

In machine learning and other fields, suggesting a good solution to a problem is usually a harder task than evaluating the quality of such a solution. This asymmetry is the basis for a large number of selection oriented methods that use a generator system to guess a set of solutions and an evaluator system to rank and select the best solutions. This work examines the use of this approach to the problem of panoptic image segmentation and class agnostic parts segmentation. The generator/evaluator approach for this case consists of two independent convolutional neural nets: a generator net that suggests variety segments corresponding to objects, stuff and parts regions in the image, and an evaluator net that chooses the best segments to be merged into the segmentation map. The result is a trial and error evolutionary approach in which a generator that guesses segments with low average accuracy, but with wide variability, can still produce good results when coupled with an accurate evaluator. The generator consists of a Pointer net that receives an image and a point in the image, and predicts the region of the segment containing the point. Generating and evaluating each segment separately is essential in this case since it demands exponentially fewer guesses compared to a system that guesses and evaluates the full segmentation map in each try. The classification of the selected segments is done by an independent region-specific classification net. This allows the segmentation to be class agnostic and hence, capable of segmenting unfamiliar categories that were not part of the training set. The method was examined on the COCO Panoptic segmentation benchmark and gave results comparable to those of the basic semantic segmentation and Mask-RCNN methods. In addition, the system was used for the task of splitting objects of unseen classes (that did not appear in the training set) into parts.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.