Paper detail

Generative Models for Global Collaboration Relationships

When individuals interact with each other and meaningfully contribute toward a common goal, it results in a collaboration, as can be seen in many walks of life such as scientific research, motion picture production, or team sports. The artifacts resulting from a collaboration (e.g. papers, movies) are best captured using a hypergraph model, whereas the relation of who has collaborated with whom is best captured via an abstract simplicial complex (SC). In this paper, we propose a generative algorithm GeneSCs for SCs modeling fundamental collaboration relations, primarily based on preferential attachment. The proposed network growth process favors attachment that is preferential not to an individual's degree, i.e., how many people has he/she collaborated with, but to his/her facet degree, i.e., how many maximal groups or facets has he/she collaborated within. Unlike graphs, in SCs, both facet degrees (of nodes) and facet sizes are important to capture connectivity properties. Based on our observation that several real-world facet size distributions have significant deviation from power law-mainly due to the fact that larger facets tend to subsume smaller ones-we adopt a data-driven approach. We seed GeneSCs with a facet size distribution informed by collaboration network data and randomly grow the SC facet-by-facet to generate a final SC whose facet degree distribution matches real data. We prove that the facet degree distribution yielded by GeneSCs is power law distributed for large SCs and show that it is in agreement with real world co-authorship data. Finally, based on our intuition of collaboration formation in domains such as collaborative scientific experiments and movie production, we propose two variants of GeneSCs based on clamped and hybrid preferential attachment schemes, and show that they perform well in these domains.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.