Paper detail

Generational variance reduction in Monte Carlo criticality simulations as a way of mitigating unwanted correlations

Monte Carlo criticality simulations are widely used in nuclear safety demonstrations, as they offer an arbitrarily precise estimation of global and local tallies while making very few assumptions. However, since the inception of such numerical approaches, it is well known that bias might affect both the estimation of errors on these tallies and the tallies themselves. In particular, stochastic modeling approaches developed in the past decade have shed light on the prominent role played by spatial correlations through a phenomenon called neutron clustering. This effect is particularly of great significance when simulating loosely coupled systems (i.e., with a high dominance ratio). In order to tackle this problem, this paper proposes to recast the power iteration technique of Monte Carlo criticality codes into a variance reduction technique called Adaptative Multilevel Splitting. The central idea is that iterating over neutron generations can be seen as pushing a sub-population of neutrons towards a generational detector (instead of a spatial detector as variance reduction techniques usually do). While both approaches allow for neutron population control, the former blindly removes or splits neutrons. In contrast, the latter optimizes spatial, generational, and spectral attributes of neutrons when they are removed or split through an adjoint flux estimation, hence tempering both generational and spatial correlations. This is illustrated in the present article with a simple case of a bare slab reactor in the one speed theory on which the Adaptive Multilevel Splitting was applied and compared to variations of the Monte Carlo power iteration method used in neutron transport. Besides looking at the resulting efficiency of the methods, this work also aims at highlighting the main mechanisms of the Adaptive Multilevel Splitting in criticality calculations.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.