Paper detail

Generation of relative commutator subgroups in Chevalley groups. II

In the present paper, which is a direct sequel of our paper [12] joint with Roozbeh Hazrat, we prove unrelativised version of the standard commutator formula in the setting of Chevalley groups. Namely, let $Φ$ be a reduced irreducible root system of rank $\ge 2$, let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $I,J$ be two ideals of $R$. We consider subgroups of the Chevalley group $G(Φ,R)$ of type $Φ$ over $R$. The unrelativised elementary subgroup $E(Φ,I)$ of level $I$ is generated (as a group) by the elementary unipotents $x_α(ξ)$, $α\inΦ$, $ξ\in I$, of level $I$. Obviously, in general $E(Φ,I)$ has no chances to be normal in $E(Φ,R)$, its normal closure in the absolute elementary subgroup $E(Φ,R)$ is denoted by $E(Φ,R,I)$. The main results of [12] implied that the commutator $\big[E(Φ,I),E(Φ,J)]$ is in fact normal in $E(Φ,R)$. In the present paper we prove an unexpected result that in fact $\big[E(Φ,I),E(Φ,J)]=\big[E(Φ,R,I),E(Φ,R,J)\big]$. It follows that the standard commutator formula also holds in the unrelativised form, namely $\big[E(Φ,I),C(Φ,R,J)]=\big[E(Φ,I),E(Φ,J)\big]$, where $C(Φ,R,I)$ is the full congruence subgroup of level $I$. In particular, $E(Φ,I)$ is normal in $C(Φ,R,I)$.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.