Paper detail

Generating Adversarial Examples with an Optimized Quality

Deep learning models are widely used in a range of application areas, such as computer vision, computer security, etc. However, deep learning models are vulnerable to Adversarial Examples (AEs),carefully crafted samples to deceive those models. Recent studies have introduced new adversarial attack methods, but, to the best of our knowledge, none provided guaranteed quality for the crafted examples as part of their creation, beyond simple quality measures such as Misclassification Rate (MR). In this paper, we incorporateImage Quality Assessment (IQA) metrics into the design and generation process of AEs. We propose an evolutionary-based single- and multi-objective optimization approaches that generate AEs with high misclassification rate and explicitly improve the quality, thus indistinguishability, of the samples, while perturbing only a limited number of pixels. In particular, several IQA metrics, including edge analysis, Fourier analysis, and feature descriptors, are leveraged into the process of generating AEs. Unique characteristics of the evolutionary-based algorithm enable us to simultaneously optimize the misclassification rate and the IQA metrics of the AEs. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we conduct intensive experiments on different well-known benchmark datasets(MNIST, CIFAR, GTSRB, and Open Image Dataset V5), while considering various objective optimization configurations. The results obtained from our experiments, when compared with the exist-ing attack methods, validate our initial hypothesis that the use ofIQA metrics within generation process of AEs can substantially improve their quality, while maintaining high misclassification rate.Finally, transferability and human perception studies are provided, demonstrating acceptable performance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.