Paper detail

Generalized ridge estimator and model selection criterion in multivariate linear regression

We propose new model selection criteria based on generalized ridge estimators dominating the maximum likelihood estimator under the squared risk and the Kullback-Leibler risk in multivariate linear regression. Our model selection criteria have the following favorite properties: consistency, unbiasedness, uniformly minimum variance. Consistency is proven under an asymptotic structure $\frac{p}{n}\to c$ where $n$ is the sample size and $p$ is the parameter dimension of the response variables. In particular, our proposed class of estimators dominates the maximum likelihood estimator under the squared risk even when the model does not include the true model. Experimental results show that the risks of our model selection criteria are smaller than the ones based on the maximum likelihood estimator and that our proposed criteria specify the true model under some conditions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.