Paper detail

Generalized Reinforcement Learning: Experience Particles, Action Operator, Reinforcement Field, Memory Association, and Decision Concepts

Learning a control policy capable of adapting to time-varying and potentially evolving system dynamics has been a great challenge to the mainstream reinforcement learning (RL). Mainly, the ever-changing system properties would continuously affect how the RL agent interacts with the state space through its actions, which effectively (re-)introduces concept drifts to the underlying policy learning process. We postulated that higher adaptability for the control policy can be achieved by characterizing and representing actions with extra "degrees of freedom" and thereby, with greater flexibility, adjusts to variations from the action's "behavioral" outcomes, including how these actions get carried out in real time and the shift in the action set itself. This paper proposes a Bayesian-flavored generalized RL framework by first establishing the notion of parametric action model to better cope with uncertainty and fluid action behaviors, followed by introducing the notion of reinforcement field as a physics-inspired construct established through "polarized experience particles" maintained in the RL agent's working memory. These particles effectively encode the agent's dynamic learning experience that evolves over time in a self-organizing way. Using the reinforcement field as a substrate, we will further generalize the policy search to incorporate high-level decision concepts by viewing the past memory as an implicit graph structure, in which the memory instances, or particles, are interconnected with their degrees of associability/similarity defined and quantified such that the "associative memory" principle can be consistently applied to establish and augment the learning agent's evolving world model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.