Paper detail

Generalized maximum likelihood estimation of the mean of parameters of mixtures, with applications to sampling

Let $f(y|θ), \; θ\in Ω$ be a parametric family, $η(θ)$ a given function, and $G$ an unknown mixing distribution. It is desired to estimate $E_G (η(θ))\equiv η_G$ based on independent observations $Y_1,...,Y_n$, where $Y_i \sim f(y|θ_i)$, and $θ_i \sim G$ are iid. We explore the Generalized Maximum Likelihood Estimators (GMLE) for this problem. Some basic properties and representations of those estimators are shown. In particular we suggest a new perspective, of the weak convergence result by Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1956), with implications to a corresponding setup in which $θ_1,...,θ_n$ are {\it fixed} parameters. We also relate the above problem, of estimating $η_G$, to non-parametric empirical Bayes estimation under a squared loss. Applications of GMLE to sampling problems are presented. The performance of the GMLE is demonstrated both in simulations and through a real data example.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.