Paper detail

Generalizations of two cardinal inequalities of Hajnal and Juhász

A non-empty subset $A$ of a topological space $X$ is called \emph{finitely non-Hausdorff} if for every non-empty finite subset $F$ of $A$ and every family $\{U_x:x\in F\}$ of open neighborhoods $U_x$ of $x\in F$, $\cap\{U_x:x\in F\}\ne\emptyset$ and \emph{the non-Hausdorff number $nh(X)$ of $X$} is defined as follows: $nh(X):=1+\sup\{|A|:A\subset X$ is finitely non-Hausdorff$\}$. Clearly, if $X$ is a Hausdorff space then $nh(X)=2$. We define the \emph{non-Urysohn number of $X$ with respect to the singletons}, $nu_s(X)$, as follows: $nu_s(X):=1+\sup\{\mathrm{cl}_θ(\{x\}):x\in X\}$. In 1967 Hajnal and Juhász proved that if $X$ is a Hausdorff space then: (1) $|X|\le 2^{c(X)χ(X)}$; and (2) $|X|\le 2^{2^{s(X)}}$; where $c(X)$ is the cellularity, $χ(X)$ is the character and $s(X)$ is the spread of $X$. In this paper we generalize (1) by showing that if $X$ is a topological space then $|X|\le nh(X)^{c(X)χ(X)}$. Immediate corollary of this result is that (1) holds true for every space $X$ for which $nh(X)\le 2^ω$ (and even for spaces with $nh(X)\le 2^{c(X)χ(X)}$). This gives an affirmative answer to a question posed by M. Bonanzinga in 2013. A simple example of a $T_1$, first countable, ccc-space $X$ is given such that $|X|>2^ω$ and $|X|=nh(X)^ω=nh(X)$. This example shows that the upper bound in our inequality is exact and that $nh(X)$ cannot be omitted (in particular, $nh(X)$ cannot always be replaced by $2$ even for $T_1$-spaces). In this paper we also generalize (2) by showing that if $X$ is a $T_1$-space then $|X|\le 2^{nu_s(X)\cdot 2^{s(X)}}$. It follows from our result that (2) is true for every $T_1$-space for which $nu_s(X)\le 2^{s(X)}$. A simple example shows that the presence of the cardinal function $nu_s(X)$ in our inequality is essential.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.