Source author record

Ivan S. Gotchev

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
1topics
3close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Cardinalities of weakly Lindelöf spaces with regular GκG_κ-diagonals

For a Urysohn space XX we define the regular diagonal degree Δ‾(X)\overlineΔ(X) of XX to be the minimal infinite cardinal κκ such that XX has a regular GκG_κ-diagonal i.e. there is a family (Uη:η<κ)(U_η:η<κ) of open neighborhoods of ΔX={(x,x)∈X2:x∈X}Δ_X=\{(x,x)\in X^2:x\in X\} in X2X^2 such that ΔX=⋂η<κU‾ηΔ_X = \bigcap_{η<κ} \overline{U}_η. In this paper we show that if XX is a Urysohn space then: (1) ∣X∣≤2c(X)⋅Δ‾(X)|X|\leq 2^{c(X)\cdot\overlineΔ(X)}; (2) ∣X∣≤2Δ‾(X)⋅2wL(X)|X|\leq 2^{\overlineΔ(X)\cdot 2^{wL(X)}}; (3) ∣X∣≤wL(X)Δ‾(X)⋅χ(X)|X|\le wL(X)^{\overlineΔ(X)\cdotχ(X)}; and (4) ∣X∣≤aL(X)Δ‾(X)|X|\le aL(X)^{\overlineΔ(X)}; where χ(X)χ(X), c(X)c(X), wL(X)wL(X) and aL(X)aL(X) are respectively the character, the cellularity, the weak Lindelöf number and the almost Lindelöf number of XX. The first inequality extends to the uncountable case Buzyakova's result that the cardinality of a ccc-space with a regular GδG_δ-diagonal does not exceed 2ω2^ω. It follows from (2) that every weakly Lindelöf space with a regular GδG_δ-diagonal has cardinality at most 22ω2^{2^ω}. Inequality (3) implies that when XX is a space with a regular GδG_δ-diagonal then ∣X∣≤wL(X)χ(X)|X|\le wL(X)^{χ(X)}. This improves significantly Bell, Ginsburg and Woods inequality ∣X∣≤2χ(X)wL(X)|X|\le 2^{χ(X)wL(X)} for the class of normal spaces with regular GδG_δ-diagonals. In particular (3) shows that the cardinality of every first countable space with a regular GδG_δ-diagonal does not exceed wL(X)ωwL(X)^ω. For the class of spaces with regular GδG_δ-diagonals (4) improves Bella and Cammaroto inequality ∣X∣≤2χ(X)⋅aL(X)|X|\le 2^{χ(X)\cdot aL(X)}, which is valid for all Urysohn spaces. Also, it follows from (4) that the cardinality of every space with a regular GδG_δ-diagonal does not exceed aL(X)ωaL(X)^ω.

preprint2016arXiv

Regular GδG_δ-diagonals and some upper bounds for cardinality of topological spaces

We prove that, under CH, any space with a regular GδG_δ-diagonal and caliber ω1ω_1 is separable; a corollary of this result answers, under CH, a question of Buzyakova. For any Urysohn space XX, we establish the inequality ∣X∣≤wL(X)sΔ2(X)⋅dot(X)|X|\le wL(X)^{sΔ_2(X)\cdot{dot(X)}} which represents a generalization of a theorem of Basile, Bella, and Ridderbos. We also show that if XX is a Hausdorff space, then ∣X∣≤(πχ(X)⋅d(X))ot(X)⋅ψc(X)|X|\le(πχ(X)\cdot d(X))^{ot(X)\cdotψ_c(X)}; this result implies Šapirovski{\uı}'s inequality ∣X∣≤πχ(X)c(X)⋅ψ(X)|X|\leπχ(X)^{c(X)\cdotψ(X)} which only holds for regular spaces. It is also proved that ∣X∣≤πχ(X)ot(X)⋅ψc(X)⋅aLc(X)|X|\le πχ(X)^{ot(X)\cdotψ_c(X)\cdot aL_c(X)} for any Hausdorff space XX; this gives one more generalization of the famous Arhangel′^\primeskii's inequality ∣X∣≤2χ(X)⋅L(X)|X|\le 2^{χ(X)\cdot L(X)}.

preprint2015arXiv

Generalizations of two cardinal inequalities of Hajnal and Juhász

A non-empty subset AA of a topological space XX is called \emph{finitely non-Hausdorff} if for every non-empty finite subset FF of AA and every family {Ux:x∈F}\{U_x:x\in F\} of open neighborhoods UxU_x of x∈Fx\in F, ∩{Ux:x∈F}≠∅\cap\{U_x:x\in F\}\ne\emptyset and \emph{the non-Hausdorff number nh(X)nh(X) of XX} is defined as follows: nh(X):=1+sup⁡{∣A∣:A⊂Xnh(X):=1+\sup\{|A|:A\subset X is finitely non-Hausdorff}\}. Clearly, if XX is a Hausdorff space then nh(X)=2nh(X)=2. We define the \emph{non-Urysohn number of XX with respect to the singletons}, nus(X)nu_s(X), as follows: nus(X):=1+sup⁡{clθ({x}):x∈X}nu_s(X):=1+\sup\{\mathrm{cl}_θ(\{x\}):x\in X\}. In 1967 Hajnal and Juhász proved that if XX is a Hausdorff space then: (1) ∣X∣≤2c(X)χ(X)|X|\le 2^{c(X)χ(X)}; and (2) ∣X∣≤22s(X)|X|\le 2^{2^{s(X)}}; where c(X)c(X) is the cellularity, χ(X)χ(X) is the character and s(X)s(X) is the spread of XX. In this paper we generalize (1) by showing that if XX is a topological space then ∣X∣≤nh(X)c(X)χ(X)|X|\le nh(X)^{c(X)χ(X)}. Immediate corollary of this result is that (1) holds true for every space XX for which nh(X)≤2ωnh(X)\le 2^ω (and even for spaces with nh(X)≤2c(X)χ(X)nh(X)\le 2^{c(X)χ(X)}). This gives an affirmative answer to a question posed by M. Bonanzinga in 2013. A simple example of a T1T_1, first countable, ccc-space XX is given such that ∣X∣>2ω|X|>2^ω and ∣X∣=nh(X)ω=nh(X)|X|=nh(X)^ω=nh(X). This example shows that the upper bound in our inequality is exact and that nh(X)nh(X) cannot be omitted (in particular, nh(X)nh(X) cannot always be replaced by 22 even for T1T_1-spaces). In this paper we also generalize (2) by showing that if XX is a T1T_1-space then ∣X∣≤2nus(X)⋅2s(X)|X|\le 2^{nu_s(X)\cdot 2^{s(X)}}. It follows from our result that (2) is true for every T1T_1-space for which nus(X)≤2s(X)nu_s(X)\le 2^{s(X)}. A simple example shows that the presence of the cardinal function nus(X)nu_s(X) in our inequality is essential.

preprint2013arXiv

Cardinal invariants for κκ-box products

Definition. Let κκ be an infinite cardinal, let {X(i)} be a (not necessarily faithfully indexed) set of topological spaces, and let X be the product of the spaces X(i). The κκ-box product topology on X is the topology generated by those products of sets U(i) for which (a) for each i, U(i) is open in X(i); and (b) U(i) = X(i) with fewer than κκ-many exceptions. (Thus, the usual Tychonoff product topology on X is the ωω-box topology.) With emphasis on weight, density character, and Souslin number, the authors study and determine the value of several "cardinal invariants" on the space X with its κκ-box topology, in terms of the corresponding invariants of the individual spaces X(i). To the authors' knowledge, this work is the first systematic study of its kind. Some of the results are axiom-sensitive, and some duplicate (and extend, and make precise) earlier work of Hewitt-Marczewski-Pondiczery, of Englking-Karlowicz, of Comfort-Negrepontis, and of Cater-Erdos-Galvin.

preprint2013arXiv

The non-Urysohn number of a topological space

We call a nonempty subset AA of a topological space XX finitely non-Urysohn if for every nonempty finite subset FF of AA and every family {Ux:x∈F}\{U_x:x\in F\} of open neighborhoods UxU_x of x∈Fx\in F, ∩{cl(Ux):x∈F}≠∅\cap\{\mathrm{cl}(U_x):x\in F\}\ne\emptyset and we define the non-Urysohn number of XX as follows: nu(X):=1+sup⁡{∣A∣:Anu(X):=1+\sup\{|A|:A is a finitely non-Urysohn subset of X}X\}. Then for any topological space XX and any subset AA of XX we prove the following inequalities: (1) ∣clθ(A)∣≤∣A∣κ(X)⋅nu(X)|\mathrm{cl}_θ(A)|\le |A|^{κ(X)}\cdot nu(X), (2) ∣[A]θ∣≤(∣A∣⋅nu(X))κ(X)|[A]_θ|\le (|A|\cdot nu(X))^{κ(X)}, (3) ∣X∣≤nu(X)κ(X)sLθ(X)|X|\le nu(X)^{κ(X)sL_θ(X)}, and (4) ∣X∣≤nu(X)κ(X)aL(X)|X|\le nu(X)^{κ(X)aL(X)}. In 1979, A. V. Arhangelskii asked if the inequality ∣X∣≤2χ(X)wLc(X)|X|\le 2^{χ(X)wL_c(X)} was true for every Hausdorff space XX. It follows from the third inequality that the answer of this question is in the affirmative for all spaces with nu(X)nu(X) not greater than the cardinality of the continuum. We also give a simple example of a Hausdorff space XX such that ∣clθ(A)∣>∣A∣χ(X)U(X)|\mathrm{cl}_θ(A)|>|A|^{χ(X)}U(X) and ∣clθ(A)∣>(∣A∣⋅U(X))χ(X)|\mathrm{cl}_θ(A)|>(|A|\cdot U(X))^{χ(X)}, where U(X)U(X) is the Urysohn number of XX, recently introduced by Bonanzinga, Cammaroto and Matveev. This example shows that in (1) and (2) above, nu(X)nu(X) cannot be replaced by U(X)U(X) and answers some questions posed by Bella and Cammaroto (1988), Bonanzinga, Cammaroto and Matveev (2011), and Bonanzinga and Pansera (2012).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.