Paper detail

Generalization of Weinberg's Compositeness Relations

We generalize the time-honored Weinberg's compositeness relations by including the range corrections through considering a general form factor. In Weinberg's derivation, he considered the effective range expansion up to $\mathcal{O}(p^2)$ and made two additional approximations: neglecting the non-pole term in the Low equation; approximating the form factor by a constant. We lift the second approximation, and work out an analytic expression for the form factor. For a positive effective range, the form factor is of a single-pole form. An integral representation of the compositeness is obtained and is expected to have a smaller uncertainty than that derived from Weinberg's relations. We also establish an exact relation between the wave function of a bound state and the phase of the scattering amplitude neglecting the non-pole term. The deuteron is analyzed as an example, and the formalism can be applied to other cases where range corrections are important.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.