Paper detail

Generalization, Mayhems and Limits in Recurrent Proximal Policy Optimization

At first sight it may seem straightforward to use recurrent layers in Deep Reinforcement Learning algorithms to enable agents to make use of memory in the setting of partially observable environments. Starting from widely used Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), we highlight vital details that one must get right when adding recurrence to achieve a correct and efficient implementation, namely: properly shaping the neural net's forward pass, arranging the training data, correspondingly selecting hidden states for sequence beginnings and masking paddings for loss computation. We further explore the limitations of recurrent PPO by benchmarking the contributed novel environments Mortar Mayhem and Searing Spotlights that challenge the agent's memory beyond solely capacity and distraction tasks. Remarkably, we can demonstrate a transition to strong generalization in Mortar Mayhem when scaling the number of training seeds, while the agent does not succeed on Searing Spotlights, which seems to be a tough challenge for memory-based agents.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.