Paper detail

Generalization error for multi-class margin classification

In this article, we study rates of convergence of the generalization error of multi-class margin classifiers. In particular, we develop an upper bound theory quantifying the generalization error of various large margin classifiers. The theory permits a treatment of general margin losses, convex or nonconvex, in presence or absence of a dominating class. Three main results are established. First, for any fixed margin loss, there may be a trade-off between the ideal and actual generalization performances with respect to the choice of the class of candidate decision functions, which is governed by the trade-off between the approximation and estimation errors. In fact, different margin losses lead to different ideal or actual performances in specific cases. Second, we demonstrate, in a problem of linear learning, that the convergence rate can be arbitrarily fast in the sample size $n$ depending on the joint distribution of the input/output pair. This goes beyond the anticipated rate $O(n^{-1})$. Third, we establish rates of convergence of several margin classifiers in feature selection with the number of candidate variables $p$ allowed to greatly exceed the sample size $n$ but no faster than $\exp(n)$.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.