Paper detail

Generalization Bounds for High-dimensional M-estimation under Sparsity Constraint

The $\ell_0$-constrained empirical risk minimization ($\ell_0$-ERM) is a promising tool for high-dimensional statistical estimation. The existing analysis of $\ell_0$-ERM estimator is mostly on parameter estimation and support recovery consistency. From the perspective of statistical learning, another fundamental question is how well the $\ell_0$-ERM estimator would perform on unseen samples. The answer to this question is important for understanding the learnability of such a non-convex (and also NP-hard) M-estimator but still relatively under explored. In this paper, we investigate this problem and develop a generalization theory for $\ell_0$-ERM. We establish, in both white-box and black-box statistical regimes, a set of generalization gap and excess risk bounds for $\ell_0$-ERM to characterize its sparse prediction and optimization capability. Our theory mainly reveals three findings: 1) tighter generalization bounds can be attained by $\ell_0$-ERM than those of $\ell_2$-ERM if the risk function is (with high probability) restricted strongly convex; 2) tighter uniform generalization bounds can be established for $\ell_0$-ERM than the conventional dense ERM; and 3) sparsity level invariant bounds can be established by imposing additional strong-signal conditions to ensure the stability of $\ell_0$-ERM. In light of these results, we further provide generalization guarantees for the Iterative Hard Thresholding (IHT) algorithm which serves as one of the most popular greedy pursuit methods for approximately solving $\ell_0$-ERM. Numerical evidence is provided to confirm our theoretical predictions when implied to sparsity-constrained linear regression and logistic regression models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.