Paper detail

General Properties of a System of $S$ Species Competing Pairwise

We consider a system of $N$ individuals consisting of $S$ species that interact pairwise: $x_m+x_\ell \rightarrow 2x_m\,\,$ with arbitrary probabilities $p_m^\ell $. With no spatial structure, the master equation yields a simple set of rate equations in a mean field approximation, the focus of this note. Generalizing recent findings of cyclically competing three- and four-species models, we cast these equations in an appealingly simple form. As a result, many general properties of such systems are readily discovered, e.g., the major difference between even and odd $S$ cases. Further, we find the criteria for the existence of (subspaces of) fixed points and collective variables which evolve trivially (exponentially or invariant). These apparently distinct aspects can be traced to the null space associated with the interaction matrix, $p_m^\ell $. Related to the left- and right- zero-eigenvectors, these appear to be "dual" facets of the dynamics. We also remark on how the standard Lotka-Volterra equations (which include birth/death terms) can be regarded as a special limit of a pairwise interacting system.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.