Paper detail

General bound of overfitting for MLP regression models

Multilayer perceptrons (MLP) with one hidden layer have been used for a long time to deal with non-linear regression. However, in some task, MLP's are too powerful models and a small mean square error (MSE) may be more due to overfitting than to actual modelling. If the noise of the regression model is Gaussian, the overfitting of the model is totally determined by the behavior of the likelihood ratio test statistic (LRTS), however in numerous cases the assumption of normality of the noise is arbitrary if not false. In this paper, we present an universal bound for the overfitting of such model under weak assumptions, this bound is valid without Gaussian or identifiability assumptions. The main application of this bound is to give a hint about determining the true architecture of the MLP model when the number of data goes to infinite. As an illustration, we use this theoretical result to propose and compare effective criteria to find the true architecture of an MLP.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.