Paper detail

Gaussian Processes for real-time 3D motion and uncertainty estimation during MR-guided radiotherapy

Respiratory motion during radiotherapy causes uncertainty in the tumor's location, which is typically addressed by an increased radiation area and a decreased dose. As a result, the treatments' efficacy is reduced. The recently proposed hybrid MR-linac scanner holds the promise to efficiently deal with such respiratory motion through real-time adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). For MRgRT, motion-fields should be estimated from MR-data and the radiotherapy plan should be adapted in real-time according to the estimated motion-fields. All of this should be performed with a total latency of maximally 200 ms, including data acquisition and reconstruction. A measure of confidence in such estimated motion-fields is highly desirable, for instance to ensure the patient's safety in case of unexpected and undesirable motion. In this work, we propose a framework based on Gaussian Processes to infer 3D motion-fields and uncertainty maps in real-time from only three readouts of MR-data. We demonstrated an inference frame rate up to 69 Hz including data acquisition and reconstruction, thereby exploiting the limited amount of required MR-data. Additionally, we designed a rejection criterion based on the motion-field uncertainty maps to demonstrate the framework's potential for quality assurance. The framework was validated in silico and in vivo on healthy volunteer data (n=5) acquired using an MR-linac, thereby taking into account different breathing patterns and controlled bulk motion. Results indicate end-point-errors with a 75th percentile below 1mm in silico, and a correct detection of erroneous motion estimates with the rejection criterion. Altogether, the results show the potential of the framework for application in real-time MR-guided radiotherapy with an MR-linac.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.